ラベル Old English の投稿を表示しています。 すべての投稿を表示
ラベル Old English の投稿を表示しています。 すべての投稿を表示

2017年1月11日水曜日

Old English, a different language?

The development of the English language is usually divided into several stages.

     ----------
     Old English (c. 500 - c. 1100)
     Middle English (c. 1100 - c. 1500)
     Early Modern English (c. 1500 - c. 1800)
     Late Modern English (c. 1800 - Present)
     ----------

Of course, people of the Middle Ages did not find themselves speaking “Old English or Middle English”: these divisions are a creation of modern scholars on the basis of linguistic feature and changes.

Interestingly, or naturally, they have all “English” in each period, showing that English was "English" from the start. Yet, it is often said that Old English is unaccessible, extremely hard to read as it is more like a German. Even native speakers of English have tremendous difficulty understanding it. It is a completely different language despite the fact that it is called “English.”

Related to this, Simon Horobin poses an interesting question:
“English has been in use for 1,500 years; during that time it has changed to such an extent that the form of the language used by the Anglo-Saxons is unrecognizable to contemporary English speakers. Today we refer to this language as Old English, but should we perhaps think of it as a different language altogether? Modern Italian is descended from the Latin spoken by the Romans, but these are considered to be different languages. Might that not also be true of Old English and Modern English? (2)Yes, Italian comes from Latin, but the latter is not referred to as “Old Italian,” so do other Romance languages, such as French, Spanish, Romanian. They do not share the consistent naming, diverging into one distinct language.
The terminology employed in the history of English implies how much later people stress and cherish the historical continuity of their mother tongue. Hence, the division of English historical evolution not only results not only from the meticulous analysis of linguistic changes, but also from a desire to claim the coherence and identity of English. 


Works cited:

Horobin, Simon. How English Became English: A Short History of a Global Language. Oxford University Press, 2016.

2016年9月21日水曜日

Being "naked," good or bad?

What does "a naked feeling" sound to you?
I don't think it is a natural collocation, but it can sound somewhat positive.

"Naked" is an adjective used to describe the state of being exposed, without clothes, the usual covering, protection, leaves... etc.

Also, it is used to refer to a sort of feelings or behavior, "expressed openly, undisguised," a usage with a rather positive and favourable implication.

"Naked" has its origin in Old English, a native language of English belonging to Germanic roots. In Old English, the spelling was "nacod." (Some might think of "nude," which has its different root, Latin. Germanic and Latin are in a different language category, but ultimately stretching back to the same root, an "Indo-European" family)

A look at the Middle English Dictionary attests to an interesting usage. This dictionary covers the lexicons that appear in the works of the so-called "Middle English" period (approximately 1100~1500).

The definition of section 3 is worth an attention.
----------
3. (a) Of ground: without fresh vegetation, barren; also, not covered (as with a carpet or blanket); of autumn: devoid of green vegetation, sere; of trees: not covered with leaves, leafless; ~ of leves, stripped of leaves; (b) not covered with tissue or flesh, bare; (c) stripped of sails and rigging; (d) stripped of ornament; despoiled, stripped of possessions; (e) of the heart: lacking human affection, unfeeling.
----------

The sense of (a)(b)(c)(d) can be expected, but (e) "of the heart: lacking human affection, unfeeling" is interesting because it stands in a stark opposition to the sense the word carries today.

What on earth has happened!?
The language is a creature, so that form, meaning, implication all change over time. I think there must have been a cultural change of perception towards "nakedness" which caused the shift in the meaning.

Finally,
Let me say that this blog's title "Barefooted Philologist" is in fact inspired by "The Naked Philologist." (https://nakedphilologist.wordpress.com/)